It seems that the situation is delicate and gives rise to diverse opinions. Here are some perspectives that might help reflect on the issue:
Parental responsibility: Some netizens pointed out that parents are responsible for their children’s actions. With this in mind, it could be considered that the brother must take responsibility for the damage caused by his son, especially if he was supposed to watch over him.
Precautions taken: On the other hand, the young woman explicitly asked her brother to watch his child, knowing that he can be turbulent. This could be interpreted as a precaution taken to avoid incidents. However, the result was not as expected.
Question of respect: Some Internet users have pointed out that the one who breaks must pay, as it works in stores. Respect for the property of others is emphasized, and in this context, the brother could be seen as having some responsibility for repayment.
Financial compromise: The young woman suggested that her brother could repay little by little. This could be a way to find a compromise, given the financial difficulties he claims to face.
Ultimately, there seem to be different views on the matter. The resolution could depend on the willingness of the parties involved to find a compromise, perhaps taking into account the brother’s financial circumstances while recognizing the need to repair or replace the damaged item.
Отправить ответ